

The exact same article that the GrapheneOS devs cited, I mentioned the other news coverage, but didn’t find it necessary to cite every article, since the point I’m making still stands.
a dude that likes gaming and tech (especially Linux) aro/ace


The exact same article that the GrapheneOS devs cited, I mentioned the other news coverage, but didn’t find it necessary to cite every article, since the point I’m making still stands.


The police’s job is to enforce the laws that be, and be bound by them. The legislature, in france’s case, the assemblée nationale and sénat, write the laws. As an example, french law enforcement can’t force signal to break their encryption, but the legislature could.


The point I’m making is that law enforcement trying to break into encrypted phones, and news orgs coverting that isn’t “the government targeting them”. There is a distinction between “the government” and law enforcement.


I mean yeah, but that’s an article from a private company that says that law enforcement is going to try to hack into criminal’s phones. Which, like, duh.
The person being interviewed explicitely says that since there are legitimate users of the service, they won’t take the same approach they did with services used only by criminals.
Avec ce nouvel outil, il existe pour une certaine partie des utilisateurs une réelle légitimité dans la volonté de protéger ses échanges. L’approche est donc différente. Mais ça ne nous empêchera pas de poursuivre les éditeurs, si des liens sont découverts avec une organisation criminelle et qu’ils ne coopèrent pas avec la justice.
they’re saying that if grapheneOS is found to be explicitely working with criminals they’ll take measures against the org, which is completely reasonable.


Law enforcement doesn’t make the law, they just enforce it. When you say “the government” you imply the legislature is part of what you’re talking about.


Yeah, but the they is law enforcement, not the government.
Depends what you play, I have a 8gb rx 6600 and I don’t really have any problems at 1440p
There’s quite a few like opterey, incogni or IDX. Not sure if they’re any good, but there’s tons of companies that do that, probably why mozilla shut theirs down


I genuinely can’t imagine doing marketing this tonedeaf


Beeper’s old clients (now called beeper cloud) were based on element, but their new ones are fully inhouse.


reminds me of one of the main mbin instances, moist.catsweat.com


All the AI (except for one opt-in feature that lets you choose what service to use) is on-device, so although It’s not really necessary, you can’t really say it’s bad for privacy.
probably the two-row bar like we had on nightly for a while.


That’s just about themes, they don’t mention SSD vs CSD at all.
The main arguments for seem to be “It’s not a core spec” and “CSD is better”


addons.mozilla.com isn’t a large enough source of extension downloads for a lot of extension developpers to be willing to comply with that, they’d just drop the platform, and firefox would have an even harder time getting people to use it.
It’s not a FOSS liscence, but saying it’s proprietary is also disingenuous, it’s source available.
Freetube is also good on desktop


nvidia opened their driver source.
Just the kernel module, dlss and such is ran in the still proprietary userspace drivers afaik


awesome! I really didn’t think that was possible without the proprietary drivers so I’m thrilled to be proven wrong.
Sometimes you really get into a project for no good reason, it’s happened to me