• 3 Posts
  • 147 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2025

help-circle













  • No, you can’t simply consider someone a security threat to the country for simply investigating Israeli war crimes. What a ridiculous comment you wrote . Always finding excuses for countries complicit to the genocide. If it was a rapporteur for any other conflicts you would never spit all those bullshit arguments. Security concerns should be backed by social media posts and public statements which they didn’t has any

    The article never complained about the purpose of the visit but him being treated as a security threat with zero valid concerns. If they don’t know what is an UN rapporteur than they are incompetent and i don’t think deserve to stay in the job.

    Yet an IDF soldier can go talk in an university without any investigations. Those who sold occupied land in synagogues was never investigated and not a single settler organizations in the terrorist list




  • it is a shame that Israel/Palestine has become such a sharply polarizing and divisive issue that we can almost automatically assume that anyone questioning anyone else on the topic is not doing so in good faith and is pushing their own agenda

    It is a shame that anybody who oppose settler colonialism, genocide and palestinians rights is treated as a possible security risk.

    Canada has decade of ignoring israeli human right abuses and can’t even say the words occupation and colonization. They let orgs selling occupied lands in synaguoges, they never blocked canadians from joining the idf which is generally prohibited by canadian own laws etc




  • mrdown@lemmy.worldtoCanada@lemmy.ca*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    1 - Palestinians has nothing to do with the holocaust and did not have the obligation to give up their native land. The partition was a recommendation not an obligation

    2 - Jews only owned 9% of the land and it was not contiguous land so Israel couldn’t be created without mass displacement.

    3 - Some Arab leaders suggested a one state solution which Zionists refused 3 - Zionists ethnically cleansed Palestinians in 48 there is zero legal justification foe ethnic cleansed

    4 - Zionists got their country and was not satisfied so they end up colonizing Gaza and the west bank

    5- Everybody including Israel strongest allies can’t ignore vocally the settlements in the west bank. The whole west bank is Palestinians according to international law yet you can’t condemn it yourself

    6 - Genocide is bad no matter what excuse or justification you have

    7- Israel always want the whole land

    After the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine - Ben Gurion

    partition might be only a temporary arrangement for the next twenty to twenty-five years - Former Israeli president Chaim Weizmann

    They attacked on a Monday, knowing that on Wednesday the Egyptian vice-president would arrive in Washington to talk about re-opening the Strait of Tiran. We might not have succeeded in getting Egypt to reopen the strait, but it was a real possibility. - Dean Rusk, the USA Secretary of State of that time

    The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him. - Menachem Begin

    We are going to fulfill our promise that there will be no Palestinian state.** This place belongs to us** - Netanyahu