A Conservative MP is calling on Identity and Culture Minister Steven Guilbeault to apologize to U.S.-based Christian musician Sean Feucht after the permits for recent concerts in venues overseen by Parks Canada were revoked.
Well, no. While the right-wing industrial outrage complex might perseverate over some suspicious and hidden agenda, the truth is much simpler. Outside the bubble of red-right performative pearl clutching it is an Occam’s Razor solution that is factually and blatantly clear: when your objective is to incite violence and intolerance, there is no Federal coddling or Constitutional protection. Even when you screw your toe into the ground and bat your fluttering eyelashes claiming innocence, you cannot pretend away the true meaning of this shill’s tone-deaf rally. Hate-speech is dangerous to the public good as so is anyone who defends it.
Are you dense? Does every article written need full referencing for you to hold your smug comments? You are the reason a difference of opinion devolves into irrelevant diatribes on supposed tangents.
Fact: the “artist” is a right wing proponent
Fact: the federal government does not support a point of view.
Fact: the spewing of a political agenda is no sanctioned
Fact: Even the Canadian champion of the right-wing nut-o-sphere, career political hack and recent loser, l’il pp, knows better than to spew his pus in federally funded venues.
Well, no. While the right-wing industrial outrage complex might perseverate over some suspicious and hidden agenda, the truth is much simpler. Outside the bubble of red-right performative pearl clutching it is an Occam’s Razor solution that is factually and blatantly clear: when your objective is to incite violence and intolerance, there is no Federal coddling or Constitutional protection. Even when you screw your toe into the ground and bat your fluttering eyelashes claiming innocence, you cannot pretend away the true meaning of this shill’s tone-deaf rally. Hate-speech is dangerous to the public good as so is anyone who defends it.
@pubquiz So, basically, you’re saying there were reasons that the article didn’t name. Thanks.
Are you dense? Does every article written need full referencing for you to hold your smug comments? You are the reason a difference of opinion devolves into irrelevant diatribes on supposed tangents.
Fact: the “artist” is a right wing proponent Fact: the federal government does not support a point of view. Fact: the spewing of a political agenda is no sanctioned Fact: Even the Canadian champion of the right-wing nut-o-sphere, career political hack and recent loser, l’il pp, knows better than to spew his pus in federally funded venues.
Grow a brain. Or a brian, as the case may be.
Let me publicly apologize to you for the reaction your comment got.
This guy can eat a dick and I have no idea why we are giving him so much attention.
I fail to see what is wrong with your comment though. I read it several times. Perhaps others are misunderstanding what you said. Or I am I guess.