• JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Agreed, but it can’t just be a money pit. Something has to change, and it doesn’t necessarily mean eliminating jobs.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Define money pit? explain what aspects of CP are a money pit?

      Other than the salaries of the people in charge of course.

      It’s a public service it’s not supposed to be profitable, at most it should be revenue neutral but that’s not possible when they activity ruin the system and push people to private companies.

      It’s all just a scam dude, it’s to break faith in Canada Post so they can privitize it like they do with everything else.

      • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        From what I’ve seen, letter mail is going down in use and costing more every year. That’s a money pit.

        I 100% agree that it doesn’t have to make money, and can operate at a loss, but the losses are growing at an unsustainable rate.

        So, all I’m saying is that something has to change.

        Even the union is saying something has to change. They’ve said many times that CP is being mismanaged and have proferred ideas for changes (like having postal workers become wellness checkers as well.) I can make a bunch of suggestions that I think are great ideas, but I’m no expert.§

        But, it seems to me that the first thing that needs to change is the charter, so that the operations can change without being handcuffed by its antiquated rules.

        Again, change doesn’t have to mean eliminating jobs. The jobs can change to something more efficient and useful.

        § some other ideas I’ve heard or have thought of: changing the daily delivery model to an address focused one; rapid local delivery services; reducing home delivery and using community mail boxes (and pairing this with being able to register for home delivery on an as-needed-basis); becoming competitive in the parcel/e-commerce delivery space; getting into returns management for e-commerce (which could help with the waste and scams issues here too); Postal banking; Digital ID verification (like the banks do now for example); etc.

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          While letter mail is going down packages are going up, rather than going and taking advantage they made it to expensive to use so everyone went elsewhere. I wouldn’t say money pit, Its a tank with a hole in the bottom that the government pretends doesn’t exist pointing to the tiny hose on-top we can see on-top with a dribble coming out.

          Everything else 100% give me postal banking.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Parcel volume is way up but Canada Post parcel service is way more expensive than the competition, so all the business is going elsewhere. Amazon just uses gig workers to deliver parcels at a tiny fraction of the cost of standard parcels, plus Amazon’s drivers work on the weekend whereas postal workers do not.

            The exact same thing would happen to letter mail if it weren’t illegal to deliver cheap letter mail in Canada (because Canada Post has a monopoly on standard letter mail).

            I don’t think it’s even remotely possible for Canada Post to compete with gig workers on parcels without massive subsidies from taxpayers. I can’t imagine a world in which taxpayer subsidies for Amazon to deliver cheap packages via postal workers instead of gig workers would ever be politically feasible.

    • olbaidiablo @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolutely, let’s outsource the most expensive workers. The ones on the board who have mismanaged the corporation.

    • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What service do you use that turns a profit and why would you want it to extract profit from said service?

      What you are describing is the US Healthcare system. They pay more, by far, than any country in the world for Healthcare exactly because it’s a for-profit service.

      So what you are saying is you like to pay more for a service because of the free market that the service doesn’t belong to.

      Capitalism has messed up our brains.

      • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I didn’t describe shit. I just said it needs to change. I didn’t even say they need to turn a profit. They shouldn’t waste money just because of a bunch of arbitrary rules that were set out decades ago. I even said the changes didn’t have to eliminate jobs.