fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoIn this essay...mander.xyzimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1429arrow-down17
arrow-up1422arrow-down1imageIn this essay...mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI think you are missing some properties of successors (uniqueness and s(n) different than any m<= n) That would avoid “branching” of two different successors to n and loops in which a successor is a smaller number than n
I think you are missing some properties of successors (uniqueness and s(n) different than any m<= n)
That would avoid “branching” of two different successors to n and loops in which a successor is a smaller number than n