And as fair as that view is, I wouldn’t do “trial and error involving the likelihood of death” on humans, or for me, most (if not all) living creatures.
So that’s gonna be a controversial sell, and using “save the dolphins” that leave out crucial info isnt going to be it…
Maybe a ocean area blocked off and they get retrained and released.
Edit seems they can
https://savedolphins.eii.org/campaigns/fow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keiko_(orca)
They tried this with the whale from Free Willy, and the whale failed to adapt to the wild before dying.
That was a Hollywood movie.
https://savedolphins.eii.org/campaigns/fow
Love how your source doesn’t actually say the orca released only lived a little while before dying
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna3700297
It shows hope for the future. It would be bleaker if we did not keep trying. The alternative is life in a cement jail.
Does it?
It shows dying early deaths. Is that better than a life in a (better) captive place?
Definitely, trial and error for a solution is better than giving up. The long term as a solution would provide forever after that point.
Some deaths would provide for no deaths in the future.
Just my plebe thoughts is all.
And as fair as that view is, I wouldn’t do “trial and error involving the likelihood of death” on humans, or for me, most (if not all) living creatures.
So that’s gonna be a controversial sell, and using “save the dolphins” that leave out crucial info isnt going to be it…
I agree it’s untenable.
There would be many peops that agree to take that risk on.
Even though, it would be a no go right from the start due to funding and as you mentioned harm to others.
The thought I had is far beyond my pay grade so to speak but would not a few deaths on either side be worth it to save many many more in the future?
deleted by creator
They tried, in real life, with the animal that was cast as the character in the movie.