I think the point of this exepirement is not to observe an electron to see its path, but the fact of obversion itself. Because without obsevation it takes both paths.
Obversion is a “type of immediate inference in which from a given proposition another proposition is inferred whose subject is the same as the original subject, whose predicate is the contradictory of the original predicate, and whose quality is affirmative if the original proposition’s quality was negative and vice versa”.[
I think the point of this exepirement is not to observe an electron to see its path, but the fact of obversion itself. Because without obsevation it takes both paths.
I was hoping that by observing your comment these would collapse into the spelling “observation.”
Obsevation is just a typo, but wtf is obversion?
Obversion is a “type of immediate inference in which from a given proposition another proposition is inferred whose subject is the same as the original subject, whose predicate is the contradictory of the original predicate, and whose quality is affirmative if the original proposition’s quality was negative and vice versa”.[
Right, but you have to define what “observation” means when you’re talking about things that small.