ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 个月前People with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1508arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 个月前message-square133linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareStern@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 个月前I presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 个月前I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
minus-squarerageagainstmachines@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 个月前Didn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.
I presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
Didn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.