tripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish · 6 days agoYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.caimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1794arrow-down118
arrow-up1776arrow-down1imageYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.catripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·6 days agoI hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
minus-squarefederal reverse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·6 days agoIt’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-26 days agoI know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
minus-squarefederal reverse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 days agoBe that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoIt’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.
I hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
It’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
I know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
Be that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
It’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.