• masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        No it’s not.

        It can be problematic behaviour, you can make it illegal if you want, but at a fundamental level, making a copy of something is not the same thing as stealing something.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          it uses the result of your labor without compensation. it’s not theft of the copyrighted material. it’s theft of the payment.

          it’s different from piracy in that piracy doesn’t equate to lost sales. someone who pirates a song or game probably does so because they wouldn’t buy it otherwise. either they can’t afford or they don’t find it worth doing so. so if they couldn’t pirate it, they still wouldn’t buy it.

          but this is a company using labor without paying you, something that they otherwise definitely have to do. he literally says it would be over if they couldn’t get this data. they just don’t want to pay for it.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Fuck Sam Altmann, the fartsniffer who convinced himself & a few other dumb people that his company really has the leverage to make such demands.

    “Oh, but democracy!” - saying that in the US of 2025 is a whole 'nother kind of dumb.
    Anyhow, you don’t give a single fuck about democracy, you’re just scared because a chinese company offers what you offer for a fraction of the price/resources.

    Your scared for your government money and basically begging for one more handout “to save democracy”.

    Yes, I’ve been listening to Ed Zitron.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Okay, I can work with this. Hey Altman you can train on anything that’s public domain, now go take those fuck ton of billions and fight the copyright laws to make public domain make sense again.

  • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    If this passes, piracy websites can rebrand as AI training material websites and we can all run a crappy model locally to train on pirated material.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    This is a tough one

    Open-ai is full of shit and should die but then again, so should copyright law as it currently is

  • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Oh no not the plagiarism machine however would we recover???

    Please fail and die openai thx

    Also copyright is bullshit and IP shouldn’t exist especially for corporate entities. Free sharing of human knowledge and creativity should be a right. Machine plagiarism to create uninspired mimicries isn’t a necessary part of that process and should be regulated heavily