That’s frankly embarrassing for the most populated province, and is also a huge spotlight on the ‘leadership’ refusing to invest in the growth of the industry. I hope we make it past businessmen politicians and make it to science-based leaders.
I’m not going to continue to feed your fatherless attention seeking behaviour you pathetic whelp, there is no good faith in your molecules, so don’t presume to lecture me FROM the internet about getting off it.
How about no, and also stuff your holes up to the elbow, turdheap.
The WHOLE POINT is that it was NOT justified in this or any case! Someone broke the law AND all strictly developed regulatory practices! You should be focusing on the individual who committed the offense and tortured animals, not attacking science in Canada, and I’d argue you don’t even care about research at all and are just reacting to an emotional headline for clout.
This was a particular research group that was flaunting the laws, it’s far from the standard. You’re embellishing it into some kind of trend when you have no understanding how scientific research is conducted or enforced in this country, it’s absolutely not that, and if you want to pearl clutch you should be looking toward Ford’s constant attacks on municipalities and environmental standards to get his cut from developer friends, full stop.
What we need is auditing and enforcement of our already comprehensive ethical restrictions on scientific research across fields. He’s using this one instance of gross negligence and misconduct to attack science in general, rather than do the proper job of enforcing the regulatory apparatus. Why is he doing this? Attention and optics to distract from his massive failures and bad ideas and investments, and also his side dealing which is getting harder and harder to ignore.
We don’t miss you, and by the way TALK TO YOUR GUY, not us. We didn’t decide to start a trade war for funsies and alienate ourselves. Thanks, bye.
Can we petition community mods to banish links to PostMedia content from Canadian subs somehow?
Oh it’s the Lilley-livered liar from US post media again, and here I thought I left that shit over at Reddit. This rag isn’t even fit for wiping ass.
Just put the fries in the bag, Peter Polliver. Oh wait, your non-existent skill-set makes you ineligible for even that sort of job.
tRump has said many times, quite clearly, that there is no negotiation that will impact the removal tarriffs. They are there to stay, and only grow punitively. He’s not interested in negotiation, he’s interested in extortion and appeasement. Conservatives want to paint this as strategic concessions, but that regime to the south has proven time and time again they’re only interested in taking. So I suggest we not follow the conservative line and concede bit by bit out of cowardice until there is no recognizable Canada, but instead rally to defend each other and our shared interests separate from reliance on, and cooperation with the US. We all know tRump’s ideological daddy is Putin, and I’ll leave it to you to google the history of international treatise and compacts with Russia, and specifically his Russia.
If you’re STILL acting like there’s any good faith coming out of the tRump regime, which is a requisite for actual negotiation, I’d say you’re too naive to have an opinion on international trade and foreign affairs at all; and if not that, you actively want to be absorbed by an increasingly fascist regime but are too cowardly to own that sentiment. If it’s the latter, just move there, we don’t need you.
Meanwhile Europe and Mexico and many other existing international partners can and will fill the trading void resulting from tRump’s aggression and deceit; that’s one of the benefits of establishing relationships based on real cooperation and good faith dealing, which is arguably Canada’s greatest legacy. I challenge you to count the remaining friends of today’s USA and tell me how that’s helping their internal and global prospects, and tell me how that’s expected to turn out for us if we follow their psychotic and self-destructive example.
Merge them. Create the climate corps and allocate federal funding to that branch of military operation, that’s how you actually get funding, and it makes sense because climate shift is a security threat as much as anything else. Also, given how shit is turning south of the border, this is the most comfortable I’ve ever been with more military spending. I’m just saying this doesn’t have to be an either-or dichotomy.
This just sounds like sour grapes whining paid for by Epic games who actually just want that to be them rather than Steam, despite Steam having provided the same service for free, consistently, for multiple decades now. The real offense here is PC Gamer attacking its primary consumer base (try to tell me the majority of PC gamers aren’t Steam users), so you KNOW Epic is paying a shit-ton for this manufactured consent and wish-casting. Counterpoint to this article: having more games that you want to play than you have time for, without breaking the bank, is GOOD actually, and other launch platforms only seek to enshittify YOUR experience for their own gain. Thanks!
Edit: grammar
“We welcome the opportunity to discuss our position with policy makers…” OR “We welcome the opportunity to spend more money lobbying regulators than any one of us would ever have to spend on any number of titles to satisfy the goals of this initiative.”
~Doodie Calls~
How is there no comment about this yet???
These fucking whale-scale welfare queens must be nationalized. They think this threat of ‘taking our ball and going home’ is going to scare people, and it probably will convince the officials already open to lobbying; but let’s be very clear, they cannot just take their business and leave. Their infrastructure is here, their labour is here, and their market is here. If they really wanna sabre rattle, stop fucking around and say “okay then, leave, and pay the newly instituted 75% gross wealth and asset tax while you abandon Canadians who MADE you what you are today. And don’t fucking come back”. CEOs think they are indestructible, but we need only look to the past to see the truth, we just need principled and willful representatives who won’t sell us out for chips. That’s a whole other problem.
Tax the rich to pay for social service expansion like we always did successfully, resulting in everything good we have, until we decided not to because rich people are cool and will give you money if you help them get richer. everything else you said is hollow words and clumsily laid bait traps. Bye.
Everything preceeding the word ‘but’ is bullshit, every time. Let’s be real, you’re all for mass deportation of visible minorities, you don’t care if they were born in this country or how much their family has contributed to its growth. You won’t acknowledge that every one of us who isn’t a born indigenous Canadian, had to migrate here and be given a chance to improve the country, which we did, every time. Now you want to pull up that ladder and assert that because they’re not the same colour or culture as you are they should suffer and probably die actually. Some believe you should be deported for not being of Canadian spirit, and so will the regime you’re dreaming about after they shove all the Canadians YOU don’t like out. Time will come that you won’t be loyal or Canadian enough for them, and you’ll be sent to a camp or deported to CECOT, and be asking yourself ‘how could this happen to me?’, and you’ll know… This is what I asked for.
If you are self-aware and you’re actually telling on yourself saying “yes, I want what they have, which is our own military terrorizing Canadians”, then sincerely, get fucked, you don’t belong here.
Tim Weenie can go kick rocks, barefoot.
Honestly, this is lazy and unfunny.