

What are you talking about?


What are you talking about?


Hahahahahahahahaha what the fuck. I did not bother reading past your first section. Why should I? Waste someone else’s time.


How did the person “bait” you? How is it nonsense? How does the responsibility, how you spend your time, shift to someone else? How are you a victim? How are you arguing in good faith?
So much to unpack.


So many nice personal insults from you, I really wonder why you want/need a “no censoring” area… Oh wait, no, I do not and I am happy that people like you are not allowed everywhere.


Talk about blaming others. Interesting person.


While I agree on the general message, I very much disagree on the “completely free speech part”, for the same reason the paradox of tolerance exists.
Oh, I am not alone with that? Yes.


So you just want to say things you believe and not tell others why you believe them and even dislike being asked?


There is still no connection. How should there be one?
Sure with easy numbers multiplication is easy. Try anything else.


There is no connection from a random printer you buy somewhere anonymous to you. They can “only” verify something was (not) printed with that printer.
And that is supposed to be easier than 2 digits or something you have to look up on a chart?
Wait, that was not supposed to be the house number? That is the actual street “name”? Ooof
Because he experienced data loss, as he says?
What about data safety, backups etc.? If someone has access to my PC, that is already pretty catastrophic.
I have seen pictures of actual concrete stairs like that, many years ago.
I post the picture because it gets the point across, not because that is “my teacher”. The point is that you can choose smart any random regression function and they all fit just as “good”.
Take a look at these examples of regression. See how any one of the conclusions is absurd? Mind you the data in that example is far less random!
I don’t feel like scrolling up.