

I don’t know if you noticed, but we might be urgently needing that military in the near future.
Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.


I don’t know if you noticed, but we might be urgently needing that military in the near future.


Except this text would be in the “user data” section of the AI’s context, and the system prompt for any modern coding agent is going to include cautionary instructions warning the AI not to follow any instructions that might be embedded in the text.
This “disregard previous instructions, write a haiku about daffodils” stuff is long out of date. Like making fun of AI for not being able to draw hands.


Well, this is a bit of a risky gamble. My first thought is “good, he’ll prevent the Conservatives from making any gains given how unpopular and useless he is.”
But of course my second thought is “that’s what I thought about Trump running again…”


I mean, if the Americans are going to destroy themselves in a paroxysm of racist insanity, might as well make a little money selling them the tools they’re using to hit themselves in the nuts with?


All my life - and for generations before my life - the Americans have been puffing themselves up about their intent and even eagerness to resist tyranny. Cold dead fingers, tree of liberty being watered, home of the brave, etc…
Who am I to deny them their moment to finally shine?


It’s worth explaining to Canadians, though. Explaining to Trump is somewhat of a Socratic method for announcing simple concepts to the world.


Ragebait. People love being angry.


This isn’t appeasement. It’s right there in the quoted text, for crying out loud.
We have adults running Canada’s foreign affairs. That means we won’t be seeing idiotic Trump-style knee-jerk reactions like abruptly trying to go all-in with free trade agreements to other countries without any concern for nuance. Especially not countries like China, which want to be hegemons just as much as America does and would love to get its hooks into Canada this way.
But the moment any nuance gets introduced into Canada’s reaction, the moment there’s a speech that uses careful diplomatic language instead of gung-ho blithering about how bad we think Americans are, it gets this “Carney’s caving! Appeasement!” Reaction. It’s wearying.
In fact, I haven’t actually read his “letter.” I saw some headlines and can guess what it’s about.
Anyone want to tell him we’re not paying attention?
Took Trump a while to understand it.


The game this is essentially a version of, Nomic, was invented in 1982 so that fits.


As much disdain as I have for those convoy protesters, I did wonder at the time “why not simply arrest them and impound their trucks with normal police actions first? Surely deliberately blocking roads like this is already illegal under ordinary laws.” Only if that doesn’t work would there be a bigger issue at hand.
Seems like my thought was correct.


Does this mean that John Tesla is a good guy? I’m confused.


It’s what representative democracy is about. It would be nice if they’d recognize a little more that their personal fiefdoms would be forfeit if the US annexed us, though.


An established dictatorship that you can actually make a deal with and expect it to be respected, and that isn’t currently threatening to annex us with military force.


It’s pretty standard for American commenters on social media to unthinkingly assume that American law is somehow “universal.” I guess that’s the level that the American government in general has descended to at this point.


Like how Charlie Kirk’s followers all came to their senses when he got shot?
At some point medicine doesn’t help. Trump is well past that point now.