There aren’t that many gray areas. You could just use a very conservative classification system.

How long until people can stop blaming the pandemic for things?

See this is where you ignored the last part of my comment. If you hadn’t you’d get why the Harley example makes absolutely no sense

I’m blind in that case because I don’t see anything that contradicts the Harley example in your statement.

And then repeat the mistakes of companies like Harley where their demographic is literally dying off?

I think it would make sense for their core games to stay targeted at the youth. Then use their spin offs like Legends to try new things like a more “mature” game.

Not to Nintendo or Gamefreak. They care more about their next customer, not their current customer.

Nintendo doesnt care about the things you care about, and never will.

That’s exactly why Palworld has done so well. Nintendo/Gamefreak left that demographic untouched and ripe for someone to come along and cater to them. Nintendo decided that instead of competing for that demographic they would rather try to use the legal system to beat Palworld.

Dude, Z-A isn’t a flagship. It’s in the Legends line and not a mainline release. The numbers aren’t so lopsided when you look at mainline games.

https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2025/05/pokemon-scarlet-and-violet-is-now-the-second-best-selling-game-in-the-series

Also, these are two different target audiences again. Palworld is aimed at us who grew up with Pokémon and now have disposable income. Pokémon is still aimed at a younger audience.

I didn’t say it was their largest audience, but it’s clearly who is targeted. They don’t care about you and I. We’re already fans, they need new fans.

I grew up with Nintendo and Pokémon too. However, if you had an NES when you were 7, you are no longer Pokémon’s target demographic. We just aren’t. I like playing the games, but they’re targeted at a much younger audience.

Wrapper is totally biodegradable. Just toss it.

“Real bananas”? Aren’t they basically all the same strain of Cavendish?

Thanks for proving my point.

I again think you mean blockchain.

In technologies around crypto, not in crypto. Crypto exchanges like Coinbase that maintained some ethical standards did just fine.

Every “crash” is usually still higher than the previous high. That is if you ignore all the shit coins out there.

They seem to be conflating crypto currencies with the blockchain technology that enables crypto currencies. If the original meme uses NFTs, it would be accurate.

Replace crypto with nft and I would agree there was a bubble. But crypto is not nfts. Crypto is short for crypto currency, such as btc and eth. I’m not moving the goalposts, you did by lumping in all of blockchain. You seem to agree that I was right.

As long as you jump out before the burst, you’re doing great.

I have no argument with that. That’s definitely how btc is used.

Where was the bubble for btc?