• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2025

help-circle

  • This is just the same kind of libertarian talking points again. Good job that you don’t personally like or use Twitter or Facebook, but big tech is always gonna act in the interest of capitalists and try to create monopolies that control information (at least in The West©).

    Not sure what sources of information you like, but I guarantee you they’re either very obscure, discredited by propaganda or have similar problems to the social media you hate so much. Social media itself also affects what ordinary people can share and what they can communicate with others around the world.

    All you’re really doing is responding to the guy yankin’ your chain by repeating yourself and saying I misrepresent you when I troll you.



  • I love how tech CEOs contribute so much. I mean, they built the internet! Their platforms got so big fair and square, and the free market never creates harmful monopolies. Just vote with your wallet. These freeloaders who think corporations that I OWN (my property) should be controlled or even stolen from me by the general public (lazy ignorant people who do NOTHING for society) piss me off so much!

    Anyway, these tankies don’t even understand “communism”. It’s supposed to be when only hard working people like Mark Zuckerberg and I have any say (I mean, I won in the free market, so that makes me the rightful authority). Don’t listen to these fools, my fellow entrepeneur. I love you.



  • Grerkol@leminal.spacetoMemes@lemmy.mlLazy moochers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Ok but this isn’t really the same thing. A home isn’t a tool you rent just to use when you need it. Everyone needs a shelter to live in.

    You give two reasons it’s preferable to rent rather than own your home:

    1. You have to store it.

    That’s just ridiculous.

    1. You have to maintain it.

    You do realise that you’re still paying to maintain it, right? The landlord is just also taking extra. Even if the landlord were charging you only what was strictly necessary for maintenance (which they aren’t), they’d still have unnecessary leverage over you just for existing in a space.

    Don’t try to make excuses for landlords. We all know they’re vermin. They’re not doing you any favours by forcing you to keep paying high prices to live.

    (Edit: formatting)


  • Grerkol@leminal.spacetoMemes@lemmy.mlLazy moochers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well obviously the most moral thing would be to live in it themselves or give it away to someone who actually wants to live in it. I accept that practically nobody is gonna be virtuous enough to just give away a free apartment to a homeless person, but selling it for a (at least somewhat) reasonable price is probably what I’d realistically do (assuming no close friend or family member wanted it).

    Renting it out is still inherently exploiting the person living there.

    Also consider that no “good person” simply owns a residential property that they don’t live in.

    I know I’m not who you’re replying to and other people might disagree with parts of this, but can anyone seriously not agree that all landlords are scum?



  • Grerkol@leminal.spacetoMemes@lemmy.ml0 critical thought
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    say anything even vaguely related to China without also saying how much you hate China and everything about it = tankie

    Then inevitably one person will come along and say “haha tankie, opinion rejected” and another will try to change the topic entirely to why “China is bad” for some very loosely related reason.

    (Edit: typo)


  • I don’t think many people are gonna have “hot takes” based on a vaguely titled article behind a paywall.

    Also “scandals” to do with the Chinese military have little to do with someone saying that Taiwanese military badges don’t prove anything about the situation in China.



  • Grerkol@leminal.spacetoMemes@lemmy.mlThe turntables
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    What do you even mean here?

    Any decision about censorship is a compromise of some kind between open communication/access to information and the prevention of the spread of content that could be deemed harmful in some way or another.

    Maybe I’m just being thick right now but I’m really not sure who are supposed to be the “children”. It seems it could just as easily be the CPC for being uncompromising in their censorship of the internet, fascist trolls who say they should have a right to use slurs and disinformation to incite violence, or liberals who are unwilling to accept that a hardline stance needs to be taken to censor the fascists.

    I’m unsure if this is an enlightened centrist take, you saying the CPC (and similar) do what needs to be done or that we need our freedom and the commenter above is the child. Whatever you mean, your comment (at least to me) comes across a bit rude and unconstructive.

    Ok your comment successfully ragebaited me so tbh I’m probably the child.

    Edit: changed CCP to CPC because that is the technically correct term, even though for some reason most English language outlets use “CCP”