…

Looking back at the code (Sigh), it’s to prevent setting the CARGO variable to cargo mommy, and causing an infinite loop. You can still do cargo mommy mommy if you like double praises

That’s if the ai is learning from the responses. But there it’s more of a problem with the site not filtering data

That’s prepared statements, not AI generated.

… Although… It could be made, and sending the error could lead to a more personalized response. As well as being able to use character definitions from ai chat bots.

… Is it more cursed yet?

They didn’t even have mentioned the comments in the source code

/// Mommy intentionally lets her little ones call her recursively, since they might want to hear more from her~
///
/// If they call her a thousand times in a row, though, something has probably gone wrong 😏
const RECURSION_LIMIT: u8 = 100;
/// This name is intentionally not user-configurable. Mommy can't let the little ones make *too*
/// much of a mess~
const RECURSION_LIMIT_VAR: &str = "CARGO_MOMMY_RECURSION_LIMIT";

No need. It’s the best DB… Until you need something portable

Personally I don’t like unit tests. I’d rather have debug asserts and larger scope tests.

But using unit tests as debugging is near too

Ignoring the AI stuff, I don’t even get the joke.

To be fair, a moron got full control of aperture so…