Right, so naturally in order for that happen the moderated side of lemmy would have to change to have some of that group.

Still don’t get what you’re trying to say. Seems like you’re pretending you can’t remember a lot of what I’ve said

My god, you’ve forgotten almost everything spoken about merely a few posts beforehand.

Me or god? Either way, I think me and god both remember pretty much the whole conversation. Unlike me, god might even remember the exact order it all happened in and exactly what each part is in response to.

I don’t think lemmy.world admins want to host child porn in the first place.

I didn’t ask if you do. Why waste time typing that?

Like my assumption is that the reason they don’t is not just because its against the law, but also because they just don’t want to - because they’re opposed to child porn at a moral level.

I didn’t ask what you assume. Why waste time typing that?

So this isn’t really a “pressure” if they happen to agree with the law, and have no problem following it.

Incorrect. Pressure isn’t erased by finding someone who agrees with it. In fact, the kind of “pressure” we’re talking about is social pressure, which can’t even happen without someone willing to make it happen.

I said, when describing the ‘authorities’ of the Fediverse that it’s comprised of the users, mods and admins. You said I “left a lot out”. Who else did I leave out here?

POTUS, ICANN, etc.

Name a single website that ICANN has shut down

Weird how you keep begging me to do this when you have nothing to offer anyone

So what?

What are you asking?

Do you need “ask” for me to point this stuff out?

See below:

I obviously gave them as examples for where you’ve refused to elaborate on particular points.

There’s your answer, looks like you’re able to waste time answering questions nobody asked.

It’s readily apparent.

Did you consider maybe that’s why I didn’t ask?

No, they couldn’t.

I think they could.

Only people who are somewhat familiar with the online geography of the fediverse could give you an overview.

No, pretty much anyone who’s ever posted on the internet would give a good enough answer for me. “Type and click the post button” basically

You couldn’t.

I just did, but the better question still isn’t how, it’s why? That’s the one I might not be able to answer.

So what’s your justification for using sh.itjust.works when it is also defederated from the same instances lemmy.world is defederated from?

Same as last time I responded to this question.

Why would you answering why you’re using sh.itjust.works despite it doing the same things as lemmy.world expose anyone?

Seems like you’re asking me to help you look up “expose” in the dictionary, but you’re also probably taking way too seriously the idea that I’d get banned from Lemmy for “exposing Lemmy insiders”

The way you’ve broken up my quotes, splitting sentences apart makes it impossible to respond to.

I didn’t ask. Why waste time typing that?

I’m 100% convinced all of this is a troll at this point.

Again, didn’t ask.

You’ve split my sentences is to the point where they have no context, and it makes it impossible to respond to you.

Still didn’t ask.

You keep saying “I didn’t ask if you did. Why waste time typing that?” when I directly to your claims about me made only a few posts back.

Incorrect. I keep saying that when you waste time typing random shit. You’ve wasted like 12 hours today.

So I’m just going to focus on one thing.

I didn’t ask how many things you were going to focus on. Why waste time typing that?

I didn’t say you did “ask”, but you did accuse.

I didn’t ask what you said. Why waste time typing that?

Here’s you claiming I believe some Lemmy Insider exists.

Yet again, this is a link, not a screenshot. I don’t know what makes you think I’m clicking your links when I keep saying I’m not. I clicked one, did that ctrl+f thing, it was extremely embarrassing for you, that was enough for me.

You attempted to put words in my mouth

incorrect

and claimed I thought some “Lemmy Insider” would ban you.

Incorrect because the “and” makes it seem like I also attempted to put words in your mouth, when the part I actually did was claimed you thought some “Lemmy insider” would ban me.

The Fediverse is not commonly understood as you understand it.

True, unless you mean it’s not commonly understood as I understand the common understanding.

I’m making fun of your claim that replying to your replies constitutes harassment.

What makes it my claim when it’s not a claim I made?

So I’m not harassing you, but I would apparently harass other people who agree with you if you named them to me?

Right. I’m also prepared for the possibility you will start harassing me in the very near future. Why do you need me to explain your own behavior to you?

So you can’t.

Incorrect.

As usual.

Adding “as usual” to something doesn’t make it correct (or, indeed, usual).

You have insulted me, I have not insulted you back.

Incorrect. Repeating yourself doesn’t make it true. Doesn’t even make it seem true. You might want to try deleting or editing comments, if that will be enough to hide them from mods/admins. Or just keep lying, if this place is actually corrupt enough for lying to yield worthwhile results on its own. Personally, I recommend you come clean, apologize to me, and seek professional help.

You think people disagreeing with you in a forum means you can’t safely have a home server instance.

Incorrect.

That is utterly pathetic.

It is pathetic of you to keep making shit up like that.

And you unironically did compare your supposed victimisation here with that of political dissidents.

Again, this is a link, not a screenshot. You keep wasting time posting links I keep telling you I’m not clicking.

Me: “People targeting you (replying to you) in this thread isn’t the same thing as the state or some other authority somehow targeting you.”

You: “Incorrect. The authorities are just people.”

These are quotes prefaced with “me:” and “you:” suggesting you’re just recapping part of the conversation again. Why? Would this be worth my time to read?

Yes you did.

This is a link, not a screenshot. Why waste time posting a link instead of a screenshot when I haven’t really been clicking your links?

“And in terms of instances, an instance owner can absolutely choose the theme of their instance.”

“Incorrect. Federation broken, which prevents this. How many times do I have to say this?”

These are sentences in quotation marks. Not reading them. Is there a reason they’re here?

Simply replying to me doesn’t mean you actually substantially answer my points.

I didn’t ask if it did. Why waste time typing that?

So why would you expect me to just concur with your claims when you refuse to back them up?

For a second time I tell you, I’m not really into riddles.

Didn’t ask.

Didn’t ask if you asked.

Why waste time?

You tell me, you’re the one that keeps doing it.

Are you of the opinion that when I said “crying” there I literally thought you were in tears at your keyboard?

Nope. Are you still pretending my straightforwardness makes it hard to believe I can understand euphemisms? (Rhetorical question, obviously you are)

You mentioned Hamas.ps first. The timeline shows this. Here is the link.

Is there a point here?

You genuinely forgot that was what I posted to you?

Forgot what?

No, I didn’t.

I don’t think I’d say you did something you didn’t do.

So yet more insults. Reported.

Didn’t ask.

I can’t rule out the prospect, but I see no particular reason to assume that there’s anyone both capable and willing to do what you want.

Good for you or sorry that happened or whatever

You realise “not really that bothered” wasn’t meant to be a direct quote of you, right?

Was it in quote marks at the time? Is there some reason I wouldn’t realize that? I don’t really remember

It was just some posts I read from you on this where you seemed to downplay your investment in this.

Don’t get what you’re saying

You did ask what I meant some time back by banning.

My bad if it came off like I actually cared what you had to say anymore.

You seemed to think I was somehow baiting you into incriminating yourself over your opinions on incitement to violence.

Yeah, you have kept doing that.

I pointed out that this wouldn’t get you banned.

Baselessly, as if I would be gullible enough to take your word for it.

Presumably you would want to allow the incitement of violence for anyone, not just war criminals.

If you have a design that enables the incitement of violence against war criminals and no one else, maybe someone is all ears. I don’t really care, I’m still kinda tired of you wasting my time with relatively pointless inbox notifications.

So what?

So it’s yet another random subject-change that I’ve been, for hours, making it clear you should stop.

You made a comment about the Fediverse term

I didn’t ask if I did.

and I replied.

I didn’t ask if you replied.

I mean unfamiliar WITH THE FEDIVERSE.

I didn’t ask what you meant, the “what the fuck” was an expression of how bewildered I was at your mental illness.

Not the future.

Again, I didn’t ask.

Mr. “I’m so good at English”.

You seem to have me confused with someone who asked what you meant. I don’t see anyone who asked what you meant. I just see me, who understood what you meant, but didn’t feel like addressing the secret meaning of your words when it seemed more enjoyable to make fun of you yet again for being bad at typing.

For crying out loud. You just said: “That 100% isn’t healthy, there needs to be a balance where each place has some of each group. I don’t want a place full of nothing but pedophiles, but I also don’t want a place full of nothing but people who send pedophiles to their own place.”

Yes, I’m pretty sure I did say that.

Now, this implies that the current instances that currently ban pedophiles on sight would be expected to host some amount of them.

Not sure what this part means, or what any of this has to do with anything.

It’s closer to being uncensored than Reddit or the Fediverse.

What is?

What a non-answer.

What is?

If you haven’t spoken to everyone, then how can you know that you are the most fluent English speaker on the planet?

I don’t really care for riddles.

I did none of this.

I assume this is a response to me pointing out something you did. Why lie?

My dude, you don’t even know how to check if a post is edited and you’re coming up with grand plans for how the future of Lemmy should go.

Didn’t ask.

No, it wasn’t.

What wasn’t what?

Whatever this slop is above me, it’s not an answer.

I probably didn’t ask what you thought about it. Why waste time typing that?

I was asking what pressure the lemmy.world admins were supposedly under when they made the instance.

Today’s capitalism making people need money to survive, authorities threatening to arrest people who run websites that host “child porn,” etc.

Why do you keep asking such dumb questions?

Yes, and that’s also vague and basically a constructed boogeyman.

Didn’t ask.

Who else are the relevant agents in the Fediverse outside of the userbase, moderators and admins?

Don’t get what you’re asking.

I don’t really trust you as a reliable narrator here, but it’d be hard to demonstrate this either way given how awful Reddits search is looking for historical threads on this.

OK. Good for you or sorry that happened or whatever.

No, you have never answered this question.

The “no” implies this is in response to me claiming I answered a question I didn’t, but that doesn’t seem like something I’d do, and you keep lying constantly, and I don’t feel like checking what quote you copied and pasted.

If you’re going to claim that ICANN would do this, it’s just a completely empty conspiracy theory.

Do what? If you mean the things I’ve claimed ICANN does, that’s incorrect. I haven’t really said anything about ICANN that would be a big secret or anything. It’s all pretty widely documented.

It means you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.

Whatever it is, it can’t, since “not knowing what you’re talking about” is a euphemism for acting like you know more than you do, which you have no real evidence of me doing.

If you aren’t even familiar with hardly any instances, how can you claim to know how they all inter-operate, and what ones are non-censorious etc?

Anyone could answer that. Better question: why would I?

Because it’s an unbelievable level of basic hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is typically seen as a bad thing, not a justification. You really need that explained?

I mean, literally you as an individual.

Incorrect. I don’t match the person you asked about, and you know that.

Why are you using sh.itjust.works when it blocks the exact same instances here as lemmy.world that you blocked them over?

Same reason I used it before blocking lemmy.world, but why would I tell you what reason that is? Rhetorical question again. You have nothing to offer and I don’t feel like saying anything that might expose people to the risk of you harassing them.