Lena
- 30 Posts
- 52 Comments
Lena@gregtech.euto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•All money probably went into NVIDIA GPUs
1212·24 days agoYeah open source monetization sucks in the corporate world. Maybe there could be a license that goes something along the lines of “you may use this for free as long as your company’s yearly revenue isn’t over X €”
Lena@gregtech.euto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•[Unknown artist] Fake it until always
12·29 days agoMy code is the opposite
Lena@gregtech.euto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Despite its denials, the Canadian government is still arming IsraelEnglish
41·2 months agoNot that I condone violence. All I’m saying is when your government doesn’t listen, it’s all you have left.
So you do condone violence? Don’t get me wrong, I totally agree with you, and in fact I’d say I condone violence (in cases where there’s no better option), there’s just no need to pretend to have a “moral high ground”.
What have I said that is so unappealing? I can see why you’d dislike me not hating snap but other than that…?
furry =/= zoophile
I personally prefer “squeal”
I, for one, appreciate people nerding out
Lena@gregtech.euto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Lucky enough, I am C++ DeveloperEnglish
8·3 months ago
Lena@gregtech.euto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Alberta invokes notwithstanding clause on trio of transgender lawsEnglish
11·3 months agoThe focus of much of the legal debate surrounds the law on health care. It prohibits doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16 for purposes of gender reassignment.
This is so cruel. They even banned fucking puberty blockers, which are essentially harmless and completely reversible. “For the purposes of gender reassignment”, of course, only cis people deserve gender affirming healthcare.
A second law makes changes in schools. It requires parents to be notified if a child under 16 wants to change their name or pronoun at school for reasons related to their gender identity. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups are also challenging that on constitutional grounds, but for now it remains in force.
This will put children with unsupportive parents in danger. These pieces of shit are putting kids in danger under the pretense that they’re “keeping them safe”.
“We cannot and will not take the risk of a child undergoing medical, hormonal or surgical interventions that could permanently limit or eliminate choices they may want to make as an adult to have children of their own one day,” Smith said.
Of course, all they care about is that people can keep having children. Classic.
Yeeeeah most of the stuff I host went down too. Including gregtech.eu
This is my new favourite silly website, thanks!
Lena@gregtech.euto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Well, hello waterfox and librewolfEnglish
6·3 months agoFirefox (btw)
Lena@gregtech.euto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Me, when doing error handlingEnglish
1·4 months agoI’ve been learning Elixir and phoenix and love this
Yep, this one!
OP should crosspost this
I vaguely remember a community existing for this kind of thing
This is my favourite talk of all time











True, I don’t think there’s really a good solution to this (other than getting rid of capitalism)