It’s possible to extract the article text by disallowing both Javascipt and CSS on the site. Relevant portion:

AWS is one of eight suppliers with agreements to provide cloud services to the government. Ottawa has more than 600 contracts with the company, and since 2020, has awarded it more than $220 million in cloud contracts, the review found. That makes AWS the second-largest cloud vendor to the government, though it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the US$33 billion the firm reported Thursday in its third quarter earnings. AWS saw a 20-per-cent year-over-year sales growth this quarter, the largest since 2022, which the company credits to a boom in AI adoption and development.

Within Innovation Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), the cloud infrastructure provided by AWS includes several proprietary solutions for the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, the Competition Bureau of Canada and Shared Travel Services, the portal that federal employees use to book and expense work travel.

Switching to a different provider for those services would take two or three years and require multiple teams of four to six full-time employees, the review found. “Alternative service providers with the infrastructure needed to handle ISED applications would almost certainly be other similar hyperscalers,” the analysis said.

“I’m sorry you were offended” is still an apology. We’ll never find out exactly what was said.

There’s a difference between hospitals being public and health care services being public. Drugs for chronic conditions. Dentistry. Optometry. Psychiatric services. Proper handling of transport costs for people not living in large cities who urgently need to see a specialist (Ontario’s reimbursement program for that is joke-worthy). Hospital equipment—constant fundraisers to replace things should not be required. There’s so much stuff that falls between the cracks under the current setup that really should be covered by the government.

So it’s going to be competing with the likes of Hart and Giant Tiger, at least in this neck of the woods. Not sure we need another one of those at the moment.

Canada does not have a monarchy and it is no longer a “dominion”.

Actually, we’re still a constitutional monarchy (the monarch is the de jure head-of-state, but does not wield absolute power), and the designation “Dominion of Canada” was never officially withdrawn as far as I know, it’s just that no one, even the government, uses it anymore. (“Dominion” is effectively meaningless in this context, anyway—it’s a word that was semi-randomly chosen back in the 19th century because people were afraid that “Kingdom of Canada” would give the Americans hives.)

But yeah, we have much better things to do with our time than worry about shenanigans by minor members of the royal family.

Except that that opens an even larger can of worms.

Currently, the GG is selected on the PM’s recommendation. We’ve gotten away with that so far because there’s a disinterested party staring over the PM’s shoulder in the form of the monarch (reducing the chance of really dodgy recommendations) and because no PM has yet run off the rails the way Trump is doing down south.

In every government decision except the selection of the GG, the GG is the disinterested person staring over the PM’s shoulder. Even if they don’t normally exercise any power, I don’t want a position that could act as a check for the PM being decided on by the PM. So we then have to move to some other method of selecting the GG. The most usual method in other countries is by holding a separate election, but that immediately pisses a huge amount of money down the drain. And that’s without dragging in the constitutional amendment considerations.

I’d rather just spend a trivial (on national budget scales) amount of money on the monarchy and keep the worms firmly enclosed in their cylindrical metal containers, thanks very much.

And that money would just be spent on the new head-of-state instead, if we decided to get rid of the monarchy.

(Don’t suggest making the Prime Minister the head-of-state, even as a joke. Combining the legislative and executive branches is Not A Good Idea.)

More proof that Trump hates free speech (as though we needed more).

While GM as a whole may be doing well, I don’t believe this particular model is selling very well. If that’s the case, it’s unsurprising they’re dropping it, even though the timing may suck.

Even if the final product is made in Canada, some of the inputs may have to come from the US, and it can take time for manufacturers on this side to take over where that’s possible.

Cans for beer and soft drinks were an issue for a while, and biting into the bottom lines of craft breweries. Canada has enough aluminum to make all those cans, sure, but not the pre-existing production lines, and tooling up takes time even for a well-understood product.

Even steel is more difficult than you might think—Canada and the US both produce steel, but steel is an alloy with different properties depending on the proportion of carbon or other additives, and some mixes were, as of this time last year, only being made on one side of the border or the other.

There are probably other similar issues, but those are a couple I’m aware of. In the long term it’ll all sort itself, but right now things are volatile, especially for small businesses needing to source peripheral inputs like packaging.

In all fairness, Carney is kind of stuck in a no-win situation. Some people are ticked off because he seems to be going soft on the US, some are ticked off because lack of trade with the US means that they’re losing their jobs. Some people, I have no doubt, are ticked off at him for both reasons at once, no matter how little sense it makes.

Only a change in circumstances outside of Carney’s control could possibly make everyone happy in the short term. In the long term, hopefully market diversification can take the pressure off, but it’ll be at least a couple of years before that gets to where it needs to be. Legacy businesses with long-term contracts don’t function on Internet timescales. In the meanwhile, he’s doomed to get shit from one side, or the other, or both, regardless of what he does.

I’d add external floppy drives to that, and any means of digitizing VHS tapes and audio cassettes. Many people will need these once in a lifetime to try to recover information of personal value from obsolete media, but almost no one will need them more than once.

Seems to me that the happy medium here might be a lower tariff. 100% was never justified, but 10% or 25% might be. Just enough to allow European and Japanese manufacturers (I don’t give a damn about the US at this point) to price their vehicles somewhat competitively even though they don’t have the advantage of ignoring labour rights.

You think that would stop him?

What they should withdraw is the Notwithstanding Clause itself. It’s a nasty thing.

It’s complicated?

There’s been a fair amount of concern in the developed world over the past several decades regarding how to handle a large number of aging Boomers in need of elder care. Immigration from less-developed coutries is one way of offsetting the demographic weirdness that we’re dealing with. That may have been the original point. So, one government sets up policy with the idea of making sure there are enough young people around to hold the country together when the Boomers are no longer able to work. Successor governments didn’t tamper too much with that policy because it didn’t seem to be doing any harm as long as they could keep kicking the infrastructure can down the road. The can has now hit a brick wall, and we have to deal with the fallout from that.

Most parts of the justice system haven’t grown to keep pace with the population and its needs. Not enough judges, not enough court staff, not enough jails and prisons or staff for them, either. Cases have to go to court within a certain amount of time after charges are laid, and we don’t have enough capacity to hold all the necessary trials within the required period of time. It doesn’t matter how carefully they handle and sort files, it just can’t be done. So some cases get dropped, and not everyone agrees on which ones.

This situation shouldn’t come as a surprise, given how badly underfunded every other government service in Ontario is.

It looks to me like she was practicing civil disobedience, or trying to. Civil disobedience has a long and honourable history, but there’s an equally long history of people being punished for practicing it, and she should have been prepared for retribution when she started violating campus rules. Doesn’t matter if it’s right or wrong, it’s just How Things Work.

The question is, would another student doing the same things for no cause at all receive the same punishment? If so, to what extent does she deserve to be let off because she was acting for a cause? Or is the entire court case in itself a method of drawing attention to said cause, rather than something she actually expects to win?

(Note, please, that I have every sympathy for her cause. The shit that’s going on in Palestine right now needs to be stopped. I’m just a realist.)

It’s never been proper solar time from the beginning. The timezone boundaries are distorted to align with political boundaries, which messes up any alignment with solar time.

You can decide to make a left turn without knowing whether you’re going to end up in Kamloops or Kapuskasing by doing so. That’s the level of steering that’s going on: no one is looking past, at most, the next couple of intersections, and the GPS is on the fritz.