Damn, don’t get your fingers near their mouths.

Huh, Ronald Reagan even says he’s stupid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWQRuRIxMBI

Full address from Reagan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEJhPXjaz5U

To the republicans, Reagan is kind of a god. Reagan saying those things really could wake up a lot of his base. That’s why there was a tantrum about this.

What sucks about the right is, spreads arms widely. They’re nazis.

Real.

F-droid maybe we’ll find a new good home then?

I personally prefer them. They’re not perfect, but it’s better than having a facebook kind of experience.

You’re not a troll, that’s why I think you don’t understand. I post something that’s not controversial and a “who cares?” kind of post. Then, like 10 minutes later, it gets downvoted 12 upvotes in a block. This is a place with like 30 subscribers. I quickly check who’s downvoting so much so quickly, with the obvious intent to hide the post. The users who have no other comments, I’ll ban them. That community is not for them. If the person seems real, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. I don’t care about downvotes in general, just the trolling kind.

That’s valid. But you’re not going to go to a community that accepts AI then, so being banned is probably not a big deal. You don’t want that in your feed either.

Also, people have been wrong about AI, sometimes it’s a photoshopped photo. I’ve had a real photo serial downvoted because people thought it was AI and it wasn’t.

There are a shit ton of serial downvoters, and as a mod, this helps you find them. Not as much on the larger instances, but the small ones. If you just post something and there are 30 users, and there are 8 downvotes, it’s pretty obvious what they’re doing.

Canada has their own far-right wing. I bet around 30% are MAGA types. If you look at any election, 30% usually vote insane.

That makes sense, I thought it would make the signals clearer or something.

Wait, what? So, is this part of lifting weights?

Our skeleton is much more than a rigid scaffold for the body, says geneticist Gérard Karsenty of Columbia University. Our bones secrete a protein called osteocalcin, discovered in the 1970s, that rebuilds the skeleton. In 2007, Karsenty and colleagues discovered that this protein acts as a hormone to keep blood sugar levels in check and burn fat. Later, his group showed that the hormone is important for maintaining brain function and physical fitness, restoring memory in aged mice and boosting performance during exercise in old mice and people. The findings led Karsenty to hypothesize that animals evolved bony skeletons to escape danger.

https://www.science.org/content/article/hormone-secreted-bones-may-help-us-escape-danger

Can you tell me why that would be?

OP can edit the original and add this if they want.

Welcome. A reminder for in case you don’t know, if it starts to feel stale, then it’s probably because of your viewing settings. If you switch it from Active (ironically, the least active), to Hot, 6 hours, Scaled, etc. after you’ve gone through all of the new to you posts, you’ll see a lot more action.

Google wants to be the go to for age verification so they can sell it to other websites. They’ll also coincidentally control a lot of information on every user. They are fighting for these age verification laws.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/44474550/20509870

Thank you for that information. Judging from Politco and Business Insider, they’re pretty good at masking their hate and propaganda. Meaning, they’re not as blatant as Fox News here in the states. Are they as shady about it for BLD and WELT?

The case stems from online media company Axel Springer’s lawsuit against Eyeo - the maker of the popular Adblock Plus browser extension.

Axel Springer says that ad blockers threaten its revenue generation model and frames website execution inside web browsers as a copyright violation.

FYI, Axel Springer is a company and owns Business Insider (since 2015), Politico, and Politico Europe (since 2021). They suck.

Gudrun Kruip, a scholar associated with the Stiftung Bundespräsident-Theodor-Heuss-Haus, has claimed that Axel Springer SE, along with its subsidiaries, exhibits a pro-American stance, often omitting criticism of US foreign policy.[58] This observation is then backed by allegations made by two former CIA officers in an interview with The Nation, claiming that Axel Springer received $7 million from the CIA.[59] The purpose of this funding, they allege, was to influence the publisher to align its editorial content with American geopolitical interests.[59]

As of 2001, the Axel Springer SE names “solidarity with the libertarian values of the United States of America” as one of its core principles on its website.[60] This explicit stance has led to critiques from scholars and independent observers regarding the company’s perceived alignment with American interests.[58][61][62][63][64] Furthermore, an article in Foreign Policy has critiqued Axel Springer SE for a history of compromising journalistic ethics to support right-wing causes, implying a longstanding pattern of bias in its publications.[65]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axel_Springer_SE#Criticism