recursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agoHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1imageHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comrecursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square26fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down16·edit-22 months agoI could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary. Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
minus-squareVictor Villas@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoOnly conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
minus-squareLemmyoutofhere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoYou forgot your tin foil hat.
minus-squareganryuu@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoSo, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoI didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.
I could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary.
Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
lol
Only conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
You forgot your tin foil hat.
So, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
I didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.