Isn’t being Canadian and caring about worker rights enough for having “to do with it?” Does a journalist need any special reason to talk about world events?
Her pic in the thumbnail looks likes she is naked. There is a tiny line that looks like it may be a strap for a bikini top or something, but a lot of her body is being shown with no clothing visible. And she’s making over the top acting faces. If you don’t already know who she is, this 100% looks like a porn ad.
That’s messed up. Perhaps I’ve been living in blissful ignorance of what porn ads look like.
“A lot of her body is being shown with no clothing visible” doesn’t register as evidence of porn because that’s a normal way to dress oneself. “And she’s making over the top acting faces” just puts her as an average YouTuber/TikToker.
On a small screen while scrolling past, this looks just like the crap banner ads that make it through my ad blocking measures when my blocker list isn’t updated fast enough. Pretty girl, little to no clothes, surprised expresion with mouth agape, some vague words about how huge something is. I recognized Rachel amd am used to seeing her in my feed, so while I didn’t think this myself, I can fully understand how someone would misinterpret this.
Is she a journalist? Because I tried to search her face without the rest of the stuff and got nothing. And there’s no source. So I thought, maybe it’s a joke about “huge”?
If you can give me her name I’ll happily edit my comment.EDIT: found her myself, changed my original comment.
Wdym? Why would it be a porn reference?
Isn’t being Canadian and caring about worker rights enough for having “to do with it?” Does a journalist need any special reason to talk about world events?
Her pic in the thumbnail looks likes she is naked. There is a tiny line that looks like it may be a strap for a bikini top or something, but a lot of her body is being shown with no clothing visible. And she’s making over the top acting faces. If you don’t already know who she is, this 100% looks like a porn ad.
That’s messed up. Perhaps I’ve been living in blissful ignorance of what porn ads look like.
“A lot of her body is being shown with no clothing visible” doesn’t register as evidence of porn because that’s a normal way to dress oneself. “And she’s making over the top acting faces” just puts her as an average YouTuber/TikToker.
On a small screen while scrolling past, this looks just like the crap banner ads that make it through my ad blocking measures when my blocker list isn’t updated fast enough. Pretty girl, little to no clothes, surprised expresion with mouth agape, some vague words about how huge something is. I recognized Rachel amd am used to seeing her in my feed, so while I didn’t think this myself, I can fully understand how someone would misinterpret this.
The fact that a woman wearing a spaghetti-strap tank top and being expressive immediately makes you assume she’s a porn actress says a lot about you.
Is she a journalist? Because I tried to search her face without the rest of the stuff and got nothing. And there’s no source. So I thought, maybe it’s a joke about “huge”?
If you can give me her name I’ll happily edit my comment.EDIT: found her myself, changed my original comment.
There’s no joke, the word “huge” is to be interpreted at face value. There’s no pun either.
Still don’t quite get why would anyone think this could be about porn