When Parliament returns on Sept. 15, the rematch will begin between Prime Minister Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.

For a variety of reasons, Poilievre, not the PM, faces the greatest scrutiny as Parliament resumes. And that scrutiny is at the most basic level. Everyone knows that Poilievre can deliver an insult with the best of them. But with a leadership review just a few short months away, the question is whether he still is the right person to lead the Conservative party back to government.

Recent polling by the Angus Reid Institute suggests that the answer is a resounding no. In fact, the latest Reid poll presents Poilievre and the Conservative Party of Canada with a nightmare scenario.

According to the poll, Poilievre has the support of 68 per cent of Conservative voters. But 50 per cent of Canadians would be “ashamed to call him PM.” That number represents a 10-point increase since 2023.

  • n4ch1sm0@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Every capitulation to the United States PM Carney does, the closer Poulevre gets to winning your next election. Get pissed at your leaders please.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      As much as I can’t stand Poilievre, and think he would have sold us up the river, if he’s in parliament doing his one-trick attack dog stunts, then Carney will be forced into defending anything that isn’t “elbows up.” So far, I think many of us have given him the benefit of the doubt with things like the digital services tax and various tariff concessions - it’s possible he is acting strategically there - but it’s about time he either starts dropping the other shoe or defending himself.

      • n4ch1sm0@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        The equivalent Liberal party in the US capitulated to death to Republicans, leading a fascist takeover. In wouldn’t count on Carney alone to put in boxing gloves on without massive public pressure; secure and make sure he knows that Canadians need a fucking fighter.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      As I think more on it i get it, i was mad but as long as we get their products cheaper, they can keep on taxing their own. What I am mad about, is Carney stepping in and interfering with the Air Canada strike in favour of a private corporation that isn’t necessary to our survival. As a union member that one pissed me right off and now I want Carney to answer for it

      • n4ch1sm0@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Editing because I replied to the wrong comment lol.

        These are the same approaches from the equivalent Liberal party in the US that eventually gave way to fascism. Carney fighting for Canadians would mean he’d have to fight back against the fascist fucks across the border. Interfering with the Air Canada strikes is roped in with the same problem in one way shape or another. Not representing constituents properly is what gives way to for people to wander and pick someone like Polievre.