• secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But for why (I’m commenting this before reading) wouldn’t it make more sense to home I’m the scope of systemd so it can be easier to maintain? Why have it do everything?

    • voxel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      systemd is more of a set of products and software components branded under a single name rather than a single thing.
      systemd itself is rather simple, as most other pieces systemd-* software, like systemd-boot, systemd-networkd and systemd-resolvd. these are usually more stable and less bloated than more popular alternatives

    • August27th@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why have it do everything?

      Isn’t the guy behind systemd a (former?) Microsoft employee? I feel as though that might offer a clue as to why the trajectory towards bloat.