[…]
[Technology companies] have amassed “overwhelming evidence” that child-targeted marketing, and the excessive screen time it fuels, undermines healthy development. By the time a child turns 13, technology companies may have already amassed up to 72 million data points on them — and there is virtually no regulation governing how that information is used.
OECD data shows that 70 per cent of 10-year-olds in developed countries own a smartphone, and by age 15, at least half of them spend 30 or more hours a week on their devices.
[…]
When social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation, and a team of researchers collaborated on a Harris Poll of more than 500 children between the ages of eight and 12 in the United States, they found something striking.
While most children said they weren’t allowed out in public alone, and more than half had never walked down a grocery aisle unaccompanied or used a sharp knife, their online use was remarkably unsupervised.
But when asked how they prefer to spend their leisure time, only a quarter mentioned their devices, favouring free play with their friends. Eighty-seven per cent of surveyed children said they wished they could spend more time with their friends in person outside of school.
Parents and educators are navigating a world where screens, algorithms and AI companions compete for children’s attention and shape their development.
In this context, the humble call from kids for more unstructured play with friends is not nostalgia; it’s a health intervention. Protecting that space may do more to safeguard their cognitive and emotional growth than any app, program or device ever could.
Now, that looks to me like it’s a significant part of the problem.
While the free-range treatment I was afforded as a child, in an isolated small town in far different times than these, is obviously not appropriate in a modern city, if the average ten-year-old isn’t allowed to walk to the other end of a grocery store or to a friend’s house a couple of blocks away while carrying a tracking device in their pocket, the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of paranoia and needs to swing back a bit.
The average suburban parent will call the cops on you if you let your kid go fetch groceries on their own a couple blocks over
And they shouldn’t be. That’s the problem. Or perhaps the problem is that the police should be responding with, “School-aged kid? In broad daylight? Obviously going somewhere and not loitering? And it isn’t your kid, or one you’ve been asked to look after? Not our problem. Or yours.”