Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agoInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1442arrow-down18
arrow-up1434arrow-down1imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·6 days agoIn a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·6 days agoYeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-26 days agoUnless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.