Canada just lost its measles-free status. So here’s the question…

If an unvaccinated child spreads measles to someone else’s kid, why shouldn’t the parents be liable in small-claims court?

I’m not talking about criminal charges, just basic responsibility. If your choice creates the risk you should have to prove you weren’t the reason someone else’s child got sick.

Is that unreasonable?

  • anonymous111@lemmy.world
    5·
    2 days ago

    I think there are a few issues:

    1. How do you prove kid A gave kid B measels?

    2. Why isn’t kid B vaccinated? Because they don’t need to be, group immunity. Well that is no longer true with anti vax so…

    3. Kid B then gives kid C measels, so kid B’s parents are now liable.

    4. Your in small claims court. You have to prove damages. So you’re going for loss of earning for an adult looking after the kid + pain and suffering. Is that payout going to be worth filing papers, legal advice etc.

    You’d be better passing a law to mandate vaccines, but that won’t be politically viable.

    Just my thoughts - am not Canadian.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      2·
      2 days ago

      pain and suffering.

      Minus this, that’s not a thing in Canada. You could seek future earnings if the child died but that’s hard to prove when they don’t even have a GED and it’s unlikely when the child is dead. (Also would take it out of small claims)