jankforlife@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoVERY concerned LMBOlemmy.mlimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down177
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageVERY concerned LMBOlemmy.mljankforlife@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squarejankforlife@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down20·edit-21 day ago And so does China The only “evidence” of this comes from the empire and is demonstrably false
minus-squareJamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·19 hours agoEh, most people probably don’t brag about doing war crimes.
minus-squareHazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down17·edit-223 hours agoIdk man, this page has over 401 citations from various sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China?wprov=sfla1 Edit: This also has a lot of citations ns from various sources too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobia_in_China?wprov=sfla1
minus-squareSocialism_Everyday@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-26 hours agoThe 400 citations in question: [1] Victims of Communism Memorial Association [2] Burger Eagle Freedom Institute [3] China Freedom NGO (Washington DC) [4-399] Western State Television Station (retrieved in 2020) [400] Literally the CIA The article editors in question: u/USA_STEM_Edgelord_USA_1990 u/TotallyNotAFed69 u/WhiteCisManInHis30s
minus-squareHazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 minutes agoGood job outing yourself as someone who can only read up to 3 lines before they have to vomit bullshit onto the internet.
minus-squarejankforlife@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·4 hours agoAh yes. Libopedia the pinnicle of (western) truth!
minus-squareHazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 minutes agoWikipedia is one of the most reliable sources of public information, most especially do to the international collaboration efforts on it. You can’t just dismiss a source on the basis that you don’t like it. You need to provide actual evidence that the source is untrustworthy
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down9·19 hours agoAnd you’ve read zero of them.
minus-squarehunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down21·1 day agoChina not empire. Behehehehehhehehehehehhehehhe!
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·23 hours agoPlease explain for the class what imperialism is in your view and how China fits that.
The only “evidence” of this comes from the empire and is demonstrably false
Eh, most people probably don’t brag about doing war crimes.
Idk man, this page has over 401 citations from various sources.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China?wprov=sfla1
Edit: This also has a lot of citations ns from various sources too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobia_in_China?wprov=sfla1
The 400 citations in question:
[1] Victims of Communism Memorial Association
[2] Burger Eagle Freedom Institute
[3] China Freedom NGO (Washington DC)
[4-399] Western State Television Station (retrieved in 2020)
[400] Literally the CIA
The article editors in question:
u/USA_STEM_Edgelord_USA_1990
u/TotallyNotAFed69
u/WhiteCisManInHis30s
Good job outing yourself as someone who can only read up to 3 lines before they have to vomit bullshit onto the internet.
Ah yes. Libopedia the pinnicle of (western) truth!
Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources of public information, most especially do to the international collaboration efforts on it.
You can’t just dismiss a source on the basis that you don’t like it. You need to provide actual evidence that the source is untrustworthy
And you’ve read zero of them.
Sounds like cope
China not empire. Behehehehehhehehehehehhehehhe!
Please explain for the class what imperialism is in your view and how China fits that.