• ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So you’re argument is that Russia is bad at making propaganda, underfunds propaganda or that USA propaganda is worse?

    That’s, uh, rather weak argument.

    And domestically, almost all of the influence comes from US corporations and wealthy Americans.

    That had me stumped. We know the Russian budget for domestic media and narratives, it is not a small one, is that argument that somehow domestic government sanctioned propaganda is somehow better than a kleptocratic one?

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And domestically, almost all of the influence comes from US corporations and wealthy Americans.

      That had me stumped. We know the Russian budget for domestic media and narratives, it is not a small one, is that argument that somehow domestic government sanctioned propaganda is somehow better than a kleptocratic one?

      Domestically as in within the US. Americans aren’t being influenced by spooky foreigner actors on the other side of the world. It’s coming from inside the house.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Americans aren’t being influenced by spooky foreigner actors on the other side of the world

        Literally the link you posted contradicts it

        Washington Post: Russian trolls on Twitter had little influence on 2016 voters

        I feel like we’re going in circles. Happy New Year!