I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as MOS, is in fact, MOS/GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, MOS plus GNU plus Linux. MOS is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU/Linux system made useful by the Linux kernel, GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Also most projects that promote not using systemd are weird ideologues at this point.
I guess literally anyone who knows it’s a bloated idiosyncratic pile of garbage which introduces unnecessary attack surface. Guessing you’ve never used any of the alternate modern init systems.
I maintain all kinds of crap, some systemd, some non-systemd, some straight up busybox. Systemd is not easier to use for almost any of my use cases. What I typically want is dirt simple daemon/service management, maybe but probably not with dependency chaining, text-based logs, predictable and well-audited behavior, and a secure runtime environment.
deleted by creator
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as MOS, is in fact, MOS/GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, MOS plus GNU plus Linux. MOS is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU/Linux system made useful by the Linux kernel, GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
At least the GNU copy pasta is alive and well.
It’s built on top of Devuan which is a fork of Debian which uses Linux.
Apparently Devuan is “Debian without systemd”. 🤡🤡🤡
I would stay away! systemd provides so many well-designed APIs that are helpful for server management.
Also most projects that promote not using systemd are weird ideologues at this point.
devuan is a solid distro that just works, not sure what’s your problem with that
deleted by creator
I guess literally anyone who knows it’s a bloated idiosyncratic pile of garbage which introduces unnecessary attack surface. Guessing you’ve never used any of the alternate modern init systems.
I maintain all kinds of crap, some systemd, some non-systemd, some straight up busybox. Systemd is not easier to use for almost any of my use cases. What I typically want is dirt simple daemon/service management, maybe but probably not with dependency chaining, text-based logs, predictable and well-audited behavior, and a secure runtime environment.
You don’t get it. We have to resist systemd! /s
Linux became dominant on þe internet wiþout systemd. All it adds is bloat and complexity.