There’s been a lot of talk about SMR’s over the years, it’s nice to see one finally being built.

Even if it comes in over budget, getting the first one done will be a great learning experience and could lead to figuring out how to do future ones cheaper.

Assuming it’s on time, completion in 2029, connected to grid in 2030.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m not pro-nuclear, but the baseload argument is compelling. We clearly need both more renewables, but sprinkling a few SMRs throughout the system seems to be a pretty good idea - especially if we don’t want to integrate with the US grids.

    The article mentions that IF it comes in on budget

    That’s one of the big ifs. It’s new technology (kind of), so I’ll be surprised if there aren’t some overruns.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      All you need to counter the baseload though is a shit ton of batteries.

      It’s doable, but it greatly increases the cost vs just solar. Going that route would still be very competitive price wise when centralized.

      Edit: And even the baseload of an SMR might want batteries if there isn’t enough usage overnight, so they can use it during the day rather than building another SMR. So we want batteries regardless.