• Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That is the point, but Linux, as said above isn’t for everyone an option.

    Comments in the web:

    **Linux faces several key challenges that limit its broader adoption and effectiveness: **

    1. Software Compatibility Major commercial applications like Adobe Creative Suite and industry-standard business software often don’t run natively on Linux[1]. While alternatives exist, they frequently lack feature parity or full compatibility with industry file formats.

    2. Hardware Support Complexity Device drivers and hardware compatibility remain inconsistent. According to ZDNET, even basic tasks like printer setup can require manual configuration[2]. Multiple competing package formats (deb, rpm, flatpak, snap) create confusion for software installation[3].

    3. Fragmented Development Focus The Linux ecosystem suffers from too many competing distributions and desktop environments. As MIT researcher Jonathan Birge notes, “It’s downright laughable that an OS with single digit market share would further dilute its market share by having two competing desktops”[4].

    4. Learning Curve Despite improvements in user-friendly distributions like Ubuntu, Linux still requires more technical knowledge than Windows or macOS for many tasks[1:1]. The command line remains necessary for certain operations, intimidating new users.

    *(With this point I am not in total agreement, Windows with its plug & play and intuitive UI only SEEMS more simple, but to remove the bad habits, bloatware, telemetrias and other crap, are required a more advanced user to get it, entering quickly into Comanche territory. I think that Windows need a more advanced user as modern Linux distros) * 5. Support Structure Unlike commercial operating systems, Linux lacks centralized support. Users must rely on community forums and documentation that can be overwhelming for beginners[3:1]. Enterprise-level support often requires expensive consulting contracts.

    1. Market Share Impact With desktop market share around 3%, many software vendors can’t justify developing and maintaining Linux versions of their applications[4:1]. This creates a negative feedback loop - fewer applications lead to fewer users, which leads to less software development.

    Summary: the best OS is allways the one which best fits the individual needs, a perfect OS for everyone don’t exist. Every OS has its drawbacks, certainly Windows the most, but at least it’s possible to fix.


    1. 7 Reasons Why Linux Isn’t Dominating the Desktop OS Market - MUO ↩︎ ↩︎

    2. Why don’t more people use desktop Linux? I have a theory you might not like - ZDNET ↩︎

    3. What Are the Disadvantages of the Linux OS (Operating System)? ↩︎ ↩︎

    4. Why Linux is failing on the desktop | Jonathan Birge ↩︎ ↩︎