ये हंगाम-ए-विद-ए-शब है ज़ुल्मत के फ़रज़ंदो,

सहर के दोश पर गुलनार परचम हम भी देखेंगे,

तुम्हें भी देखना होगा ये आलम हम भी देखेंगे

– Sahir Ludhianvi

  • 1 Post
  • 18 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2025

help-circle
  • You’ll be fine. Your governments won’t wage direct war, they’ll sell weapons. The US called it a ‘Cold War’ while numerous wars directly funded by it were massacring people in the ‘third world’. They’ll call it ‘third world tribalism’ or something stupid like that while we fight pointless wars and you’d be shown news about how nice your country is to not go into war, and how utterly uncivilised and stupid we are while they fund armed groups to aggravate people. Why do you care?


  • WW3 isn’t going to happen. If you had known anything about the India-Pak conflict, you wouldn’t have said that. Look up Pulwama, 2019 and Kargil War.

    The official reason was false bomb threats that happened months ago in some schools in Delhi and other places. Completely unrelated to the conflict in Pahalgam or the strikes in Pakistan and Pakistan Administered Kashmir. The rest is far too ignorant to respond to. See my comment here and do some research. Either way, idgaf. Please don’t ping me again. I’d much rather talk about it with fellow Indian leftists than with people with no understanding of India or Pakistan.





  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlsomeone teach them LaTeX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    According to this article, even the value of epsilon is wrong. Epsilon stands for ‘price elasticity’, which seems to measure how much tariffs would affect the price of an item. 0.25 is the value used by the White House, but some economists have come out saying it is actually closer to 0.945, indicating that prices are affected far greater by tariffs than what these buffoons claim. But even with the correct value, the formula makes no sense.

    Without the fancy shit, it’s basically (exports/imports) - 1.



  • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlStalin the mysagonist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yeah because working outside and still doing all the domestic work is so much better than being confined to the house. Who needs feminism?

    No doubt the Soviet Union was a huge step forward for women but this is just a dumb thing to say. Women doing unpaid household labour and emotional labour has always been the case.