• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I marvel at the proficiency with which Microsoft tears down every piece of software it touches nowadays.

    • Lena@gregtech.euOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ll get downvoted for this, but I think they take good care of github and Minecraft. As for the rest though… not so good.

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        … Didn’t they revoke the Minecraft licenses people purchased because they didn’t manage to migrate their Mojang accounts to Microsoft accounts in a short amount of time?

        • Lena@gregtech.euOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          People were given three years to migrate, I wouldn’t quite call that short

          • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            People have absolutely taken a multi-year break from Minecraft before.

            Really though, why is there a time limit at all? Google still allows you to convert old Youtube accounts to Google accounts, why can’t Microsoft do the same?

      • Wayward@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah dog pretty much everything on the github website is an interface to display info held in the .git folder of the website.

        Thats how theres github, gitlab, gitea, gitlab, forgejo, etc etc. There are even applications you can download to visualize info in git that run on your local machine, and only see youe local filesystem.

        • moseschrute@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Maybe what I misunderstood is where git ends and github starts. I know there are other hosting platforms, and I’ve used a lot of git visualizers. But what I’ve never tried to do is use git with multiple developers without connecting to some 3rd party server. Is there some peer to peer functionality built into git or did I totally misunderstand your original comment? Or are you literally sharing the git folder via network file system, thumb drive, etc?

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Git doesn’t have a concept of a preferred repository; your local copy is exactly as valid to git as a git server hosted on github.

            The originally intended workflow as I understand it involved generating patches which would be shared via a mailing list.

            In practice there will generally be a repository that’s considered “canonical” for a project, whether that’s the one on the computer of the lead maintainer or some hosted solution.

            A basic git server is essentially just a repository owned by a restricted user with SSH access granted to maintainers.. This can allow users to push and pull from a centralised or semi-centralised repository in much the same way as GitHub.