• orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I don’t really care about vibe coders but as a dev with just under 2 decades in the field:

    1. Your vibe coding shit will not go to prod until humans fully review it
    2. You better review it yourself first before offloading that massive mental drain to someone else (which means you still need to have some semblance of programming skills). Don’t open a PR with 250 files in it and then tell someone else to validate it.
    3. Use more context. Don’t give it vague ass prompts.
    4. Don’t use auto-accept. That’s just lazy asshole shit.

    I can’t stress this enough: if you give me a PR with tons of new files and expect me to review it when you didn’t even review it yourself, I will 100% reject it and make you do it. If it’s all dumped into a single commit, I will whip your computer into the nearest body of water and tell you to go fish it out.

    I don’t care what AI tool wrote your code. You’re still responsible for it and I will blame you.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    Swear to god the vibe coding movement is going to create so many new jobs in the ilk of “I hired some dude to write my startup thing and now it’s gone all to shit, can you make it actually good and scalable and responsive please?”

    • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s strange, but I’ve seen lots of comments that are not aware this is fake. The ai hater crowd is using it as their proof, the other side saying he is using it wrong.

      • zeropointone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        That’s depressing. This is so obviously fake because of how entertaining it is written and how the conclusion gets shoved in your face. No subtlety.

    • andioop@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Is that what the weird extra width on some letters is, artifacts from some AI generating the post?

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No, the phrasing makes it clear someone wrote a fictional account of becoming self aware that the output of vibe coding isn’t maintainable as it scales.

        • andioop@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I’m entirely too trusting and would like to know what about the phrasing tips you off that it’s fictional. Back on Reddit I remember so many claims about posts being fake and I was never able to tease out what distinguished the “omg fake! r/thathappened” posts from the ones that weren’t accused of that, and I feel this is a skill I should be able to have on some level. Although taking an amusing post that wasn’t real as real doesn’t always have bad consequences.

          But I mostly asked because I’m curious about the weird extra width on letters.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            3 hours ago

            When something is too “on the nose,” for example, it’s written in exactly the way that would induce the most cheering and virality because it appeals so much to one group of people, it’s worth considering it may have been written to provoke exactly that reaction.

            • andioop@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Thanks!

              I really wish people did not do this. This isn’t something I was ever taught to look for, and I like to think I got a good education. I was taught to make sure my source is credible, to consider biases and spin and what things are facts and what is just opinion, but I wasn’t taught to look for a lot of deception people call out online. But I guess I have to live with this and gain the skill to look for deception. Genuinely, thanks for helping me, since I don’t think I ever would have figured out what raises “fake” flags in most peoples’ heads on my own.

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                2 hours ago

                AmidFuror’s description is on point and I see it as a variant of Poe’s Law. Instead of sarcasm being mistaken for a real belief, it is presenting a fictional account of someone being self aware that is mistaken for someone actually becoming self aware.

                There are two lines that make me absolutely certain it is written by someone who it not a vibe coder and is leaning into the sarcasm.

                • ‘pulling out my wallet for someone that knows what they are doing’ implies the poster knows they don’t know what they are doing
                • ‘vibe coding is just roleplaying for guys who want to feel like hackers’ is a joke I’ve seen directed at vibe coders more than once

                Keep in mind that not all deception is malicious, but most people see the word deception as having a negative implication. An actor/actress pretending to be someone else is technically deceptive the same way as whoever wrote this hilarious post. They are presenting a fictional account for an audience.

                • andioop@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  You are right about the thespian thing, but when you watch TV/film/theatre everyone is in on the “joke” and we all know they’re not really falling in love, getting murdered, or whatever dramatic happening. I’m not sure if OOP is just trying to entertain and expects everyone to realize they’re joking, which would stick them on the thespian side, or if they have other motives. But hey, interesting point to bring up!

                • andioop@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  You are right about the thespian thing, but when you watch TV/film/theatre everyone is in on the “joke” and we all know they’re not really falling in love, getting murdered, or whatever dramatic happening. I’m not sure if OOP is just trying to entertain and expects everyone to realize they’re joking, which would stick them on the thespian side, or if they have other motives. But hey, interesting point to bring up!

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 hours ago

            r/thatHappened was the worst thing to happen to Reddit and I sincerely hate whoever created that sub

      • zeropointone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No, the text itself. No vibe coder would write something like that. The artifacts you mentioned are the result of simple horizontal and vertical upscaling. If you zoom in you can see it better.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      it’s buzzword speak for “connect chatgpt to your editor, tell it what you want, and blindly accept the answer”

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a real post on Reddit. I don’t know what combination of screenshotting/uploading tools leads to this kind of mangling, but I’ve seen it in screenshots from Android, too. The artifacts seem to run down in straight vertical lines, so maybe slight scaling with a nearest-neighbor algorithm (in 2025?!?) plus a couple levels of JPEG compression? It looks really weird.

      I’m curious. If anyone knows, please enlighten me!

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Oh, if it’s just a random Android fork/version being terrible at something, I understand now. Maybe it’s a phone with a screen that isn’t standard in someway.

    • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Whoa whoa, what do you want to do, crash the entire US stock market over here?! Our whole economy is propped up by the story that AI is the future and will replace all jobs forever. We’ve got MS paying OpenAI paying Nvidia, and that’s making the line go up.

      So let’s be cool with throwing around “numbers” that “prove” the emperor has no clothes. Because, like, we gotta pretend he does at least until the next thing that needs every video card ever.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Bruh yer not doing it right. Are you stupid, bruh? You gotta work on yer promps, bruh. You gotta watch some tiktoks on it, bruh. Bruh, go watch @demisets4, bruh. Learn to prompt, bruh. Your not good at it, bruh. Bruh, you should try something else if you can’t figure it out that’s a you problem, bruh.

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Has to be fake, or he just heard the word flow state somewhere and misunderstood it’s meaning, lol