I think anyone who grew up here would agree but it’s the reasonable limits clause.
What I find funny is when people act like these laws target Muslims when the majority of religious people in this country are Christians. The door knockers are the people being targeted. These laws protect Muslims from the Christians trying to force their religion on them because as a private matter your neighbours shouldn’t know what you practice.
Doesn’t the existence of this bill at all make you question your belief?
No, it provides a standardized punishment for this given right infringement. To differentiate it from (example) those crazy prayer circles the yanks have at sports games.
In Canada freedom of religion includes freedom from it. By preaching or practicing in public you infringe on everyone else’s rights.
Removed by mod
Yes, that’s the country we live in.
It’s why there’s calls for politicians to resign whenever they mention god. (Yes there are campaigns to change the anthems)
Removed by mod
I think anyone who grew up here would agree but it’s the reasonable limits clause.
What I find funny is when people act like these laws target Muslims when the majority of religious people in this country are Christians. The door knockers are the people being targeted. These laws protect Muslims from the Christians trying to force their religion on them because as a private matter your neighbours shouldn’t know what you practice.
Removed by mod
If we consider this internet community to be public then yes.
Removed by mod
No, it provides a standardized punishment for this given right infringement. To differentiate it from (example) those crazy prayer circles the yanks have at sports games.
Removed by mod
That makes zero sense logically.
Freedom of clothing includes freedom from clothing. By wearing clothing in public you infringe on everyone else’s rights.
Freedom of reading means freedom from reading. By reading in public you infringe on everyone else’s rights.
Freedom of speech means freedom from speech. By speaking in public you infringe on everyone else’s rights.
You see? It doesn’t make any sense and is actually the opposite of freedom.
Don’t try to argue that your prohibition as liberty. It’s nonsensical and the opposite of liberty.
Only one of those is a freedom
And yes we have freedom from hate speech and misinformation.
Removed by mod
It’s called an analogy.
I no longer expect you to express understanding, since you’re so hell bent not to.