Can someone explain to me

  1. Why does he think Trump the yaphead would ever shut up about anything ever
  2. What good are “bilateral talks” with someone that can’t keep their word anyway ?

What is the point here trying to show everyone just how much of a illequipped, stay-the-course, liberal empty suit he is and how he’s going to boldly going to try to “do the same thing we’ve always done except not woke this time and hope it keeps working”

Don’t these people understand that the US is only good at one thing and it’s eating liberal banking stiffs alive ?

Are they trying to lose on purpose ?

  • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think the answer to 1 is that he doesn’t, so it’s just a good excuse to avoid getting pushed into a situation related to 2. In other words, the POV is likely, “there isn’t any point in bilateral talks, but let’s say we’ll do it if he shuts up about that thing that he can’t stop talking about” - it’s just a way to pin the blame for a lack of talks down South.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s exactly the kind of hedging their bets centrist bull that will lose them the election. We already know they are insincere and there won’t be negotiations because even an agreement would have no value. Give the Orange douche a bloody nose right now, rather than putting red lines he’s obviously going to cross and that will just make Canada lose face for nothing.

      • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        You keep saying he’s doing it wrong without saying what you think he (or any leader of Canada) should do. How exactly do you want him to give Trump a bloody nose and what do you think the response from the US would be?