• tehWrapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m confused why governments and public funded organizations are allowed to use social media platforms. They cannot control so much of the system.

    But we do live in a world now where the president of the United States of America releases policy changes via thoughts and memes on his own social media platform…

    • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      why governments and public funded organizations are allowed to use social media platforms

      Because more outreach “for free”. It would be weird if they were forbidden from it.

        • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You know what I mean. Or at least you should.

          It’s free in terms of government operating costs for the technology, in a way that not even their official emails is.

          They would have to pay an outreach person anyway. Social media is the lowest barrier outreach channel. It’s easy to spend less and reach more when compared to sending me correspondence via mail like some officials in my area do.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Our local police posts really important updates on Twitter. I never see them because I don’t use Twitter.

      Guess I’ll get murdered one day by someone considered armed and dangerous in the area, because I unknowingly approached them without calling the police. 😞

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m confused why governments and public funded organizations are allowed to use social media platforms.

      They’re trying to meet citizens where they’re at. The idea isn’t completely without merit, but government—at all levels—should be treating these accounts as secondary while running primary accounts on their own infrastructure.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Right? Especially now that BSky and Threads are bridging to the Fediverse, it should be reasonable to have gov’t run Mastodon instances.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        They should just be posting shit on their websites. We still have web browsers. We don’t need to be able to reply.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I agree but the ability to have a public conversation with these organizations is excellent. It’s something I’ve really missed since I left Twitter. “Hey <company that puts you on hold for hours when you call for support> fix this crappy problem!”

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Like OK.

    How about we make them pay taxes? I’ll pay mine when they pay theirs.