• WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.orgBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just searched for them and all that came up was the new articles all released within 24h…

    Honeypot?

  • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Holy wall of text Batman! I’m lowkey interested in the service, but uhhhh…

      • QuestionMark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sorry, I truly do not intend to be impolite and I didn’t downvote you, but I think people can ask AI for a summary if they want to themselves.

        Sorry again. I just really don’t like AI, and my expectation of a social media website is for it to be about human interactions. We can talk with AI anytime we want, what we’re lacking is pure human communication.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Agree, but such a brick of the posted text also don’t make easy a good conversation, in this case a summary can be helpfull knowing what is about.

          • hoppolito@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            But that ‘brick’ of the posted text is just the article that is linked. So if we are commenting under a post dedicated to the article it would stand to reason that we read the article itself, would you not agree?

          • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            a summary can be helpfull

            No. LLMs can’t reliably summarize without inserting made-up things, which your now-deleted comment (which can still be read in the modlog here) is a great example of. I’m not going to waste my time reading the whole thing to see how much is right or wrong but it literally fabricated a nonexistent URL 😂

            Please don’t ever post an LLM summary again.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    A few things. If you sign up, don’t then go use the number with things that associate it to your real identity like a bank account or credit card. Also, if you’ve already used your phone with a provider that has your real name, then it’s compromised because you could be linked by the IMEI. Get a fresh phone that you’ve never linked to your identity before. Also, don’t transfer your number to this service. Get a new number provided by them. Additionally, pay with cryptocurrency.

    This is all if you want to stay truly anonymous with no traces back to you.

  • delta_fsociety@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    TLDR; Nicholas Merrill, a well known privacy activist, launched Phreeli, a phone service that lets you use mobile data and calls without giving your identity. It runs on T Mobiles network but only keeps a ZIP code and uses zero knowledge crypto so even payments are not linked to you. Merrill spent 10 years fighting the FBI over surveillance and now wants to make privacy simple and normal for everyone.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    phreeli.com

    Phreeli users can also pay their bills with tough-to-trace cryptocurrency like Zcash or Monero.

    Lies. I did this so you don’t have to.

  • ray@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    You don’t even need a zipcode if you use https://silent.link/ then you can pay with whatever crypto and have an esim where the balance never expires and it works in most of the world. I’ve used it a few months and it’s pretty good if you don’t need a phone number.

  • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay I looked over their stuff, a couple thoughts:

    I want them to be more clear in their privacy policy about what exactly they can and would reveal for a court order, what their screening process is for those orders, under what conditions they would fight one and if they will reveal anything outside the context of a full court order.

    Reason: this is one of your biggest areas of vulnerability when signing up for a phone plan.

    The lexipol leaks showed that many police departments use phone information requests so much that they include a set of request forms (typically one for each carrier) in the appendix of their operations manuals. Frequently the forms are the only data request tool in that appendix.

    If you happened to have a call with someone who then did something Cool™ and got picked up, expect the detective to have your name and address on a post-it on their desk by the next morning. If you talked to them on some online chat platform they’ll send a court order to that platform for your IP then do the same to your carrier to unmask your identity.

    Yes, if you were also sufficiently Cool™ they’ll start doing more invasive things like directly tracking your phone via tower dumps, but that’s a significant escalation in time and effort. If things got Cool™ enough that this is a concern though, it may buy you time to get a new phone if you live in an area dense enough for that to not be immediately identifying.

    Also: I suspect the zip code is completely unverifiable so put whatever you want in there, basically pick your favorite sales tax rate.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Very impressive.

    When will this service be forced to change or shut down? I think five years. Possibly less if a major case hits the news where a bad actor used the service.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      seems like a boon to swatters and the shitbags of the world… sure, privacy minded people, ICE trackers etc., yeah, but also… the shitbags…

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wait, they ask for your details when setting up a phone in America?

    I thought y’all lived in the land of the free!

    The most I’ve ever been asked for to setup a phone is my bank details, and that’s it, so they can setup direct debit for my contract

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every EU phone number has to be connected to an identifiable person or company.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The ability to pay money for your contract?

        Edit: they only ask for that if on Contract, if pay-as-you-go they ask for no details at all

          • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            A direct debit is a contractual agreement, they have zero access to the bank account, just the unique identification number and an automated system that requests money from that unique identifier once per month.

            And that if there’s no money in the account, they don’t take you into credit, but instead just pause service until you pay

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              These services usually have the ability to debit whatever your bill is, and then suddenly their system fucks up, or you get hacked and someone commits fraud, and before you know it a $5000 payment comes out of your account instead of the expected $30.00.

              It’s better to have that set up on a credit card in case something happens and you get a much better chance to dispute it.

              • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That’s literally impossible, it’s not how it works

                At the very least it’s literally impossible in UK and EU.

                The system isn’t actually taking any money from you at all, it’s merely sending requests to the bank to ask for the money.

                Some banks automatically will go “okay!”, some need human confirmation for every transaction, ALL need human confirmation for any transactions over £200 (by law)

                • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  That’s definitely a UK/EU thing then. If you get a $5000 cellphone bill in NA because someone did long distance fraud and you have pre authorized debits set up, $5000 is coming out of your account in Canada and USA.

                  Edit: assuming you have 5k and or have overdraft on the account. Not sure what happens if you have less than 5k and no overdraft. Like I don’t know if it’d take you to $0, or fail and charge you a insufficient fund fee.

            • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Depends on where you live of course. I always find it very disconcernibg linking bank accounts even I countries where it should be ok. The fuck ups are way too many for me. I don’t want any of that.

    • TrippingBalls@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had to give a fingerprint and a picture of me holding my passport, plus copy of the passport to get a Sim in Peru…plus a half hour of my life in the process

  • ApeNo1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there a reason they used an image of a phone with a screen smeared with what looks like rendered goose fat?

    • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      i think it’s fingerprints…?

      Like a pun on data fingerprinting. But that’s not exactly what this service protects against.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve bought and activated several prepaid phones over the years, paid cash, obviously pseudonymous name, no ID. Last was several years ago, idk if you can still do that. When I did it, it was at phone stores and they told me it was ok.

    That said, phones will never be private. There’s too much tracking and logging. People can’t accept that, because they love their phones too much. But you have to make a choice. Anonymous carriers are of almost no help because all the stuff about deanonymizing database records applies even more to phones. At best they help stay away from some marketing crap and stuff on that level. Government surveillance will see right through it.

      • lib1 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not possible in any corporate stores purely for the fact that they use facial recognition extensively. Doesn’t matter if you can technically get away with paying cash and using a fake name. You’re being tracked the moment their cameras can see you and they have extensive profiles on people even if you’ve never used a debit card, given them an email, or given them a phone number.

        • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also, the ones I’ve seen in stores lately hare only the trial offers that are only good for a couple days and have to be “replenished” with an online account to stay functional for more than a couple days. Mint wouldn’t even activate initially with an email alias. I called support and they said “we can’t activate it with that email, we need your real email.” I then told them no worries, I’d just return it to best buy. Then they “found a way” to activate it, but I would have needed to give a credit card if I wanted it to stay active more than the 3 days. Best buy didn’t carry any longer duration prepaid card in the stores.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Pay some guy to go in and buy them.

          Or have them mailed to someone you know

          Or use prepaid esim, paid with prepaid debit card

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You can still do it.

      Just buy from a heavily trafficked grocery store. Arrive by foot. Wear a good covid mask. Pay with cash. Wait a few weeks after purchase before use.

      Before you turn it on, cover all cameras with tape and disable the microphone if you can (or plug it with a cutoff headphone jack).

      Cut a piece of paper and wedge it between the battery leads. Only pull it out and turn it on in a public place far from your home. And you have to burn the phone after every service you activate.